Greetings to all and welcome new friends to the EastWing.
It seems this crazy feeding frenzy on the Confederate flag gets more bizarre with each passing day. Now people with no knowledge of history are demanding that things be removed from society as being oppressive and racist. Once again we are proving that lack of knowledge is detrimental to the peace and tranquility of society. Another way to say it is “Ya can’t fix stupid”.
When this Confederate flag thing started, I had no real position one way or the other. As things got to where it’s at today, it is time to state many truths that most of you have never heard before and will find hard to believe. Some of you will disagree with every word. While a few will say, “I knew that”, and some will be amazed. Yet every word is true. Sometimes it’s difficult to face the fact that you’ve been mislead forever. And so I will walk with you down a history lane. The southern back roads of history as you’ve never walked before.
What we see happening in the United States today is an apt illustration of why the Confederate flag was raised in the first place. What we see materializing before our very eyes is tyranny: tyranny over the freedom of expression, tyranny over the freedom of association, tyranny over the freedom of speech, and tyranny over the freedom of conscience. A reason to be alarmed.
A Confederate General, Patrick Cleburne, warned of the historical consequences should the South lose their war for Independence. General Cleburne said if the South lost, “it means the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy. That our youth will be trained by Northern school teaches, they will learn from Northern school books their version of this war. They will be impressed by all of the influences of history and education to regard our gallant debt as traitors and our maimed veterans as fit subjects of derision. No truer words were ever spoken by a Southern General, or any General.
History revisionists flooded America’s public schools with the Northern propaganda about the people who attempted to secede from the United States. Characterizing those as racists, extremists, radicals, hate mongers, and traitors. You know this technique, it’s used today by the current administration in Washington D.C. It’s the same way that people today in our federal government and news media attempt to characterize Christians, Patriots, War Veterans, Constitutionalists and Conservative points of view.
Please to understand that the only people in 1861 who believed that states did NOT have the right to secede were Abraham Lincoln and his radical Republicans. To say that the southern states did not have the right to secede from the United States is to say that the thirteen colonies did not have the right to secede from England. On this issue, one cannot be right on one and the other wrong. If one is right, both are right. How could this nation celebrate our Declaration of Independence in 1776 and then turn around and condemn the Declaration of Independence of the Confederacy in 1861? Is this not hypocrisy of the highest order?
In fact, the southern states were not the only states that talked about secession. After the southern states seceded, the State of Maryland fully intended to join them. In September 1861 Lincoln sent federal troops to the Maryland State Capital and seized the legislature by force in order to prevent them from voting. Federal provost marshals stood guard and arrested Democrats and anyone else who believed that Maryland should secede. A special furlough was granted to Maryland Troops so they could go home and vote against secession. Judges who tried to inquire into the phony elections were arrested and thrown into military prisons. All that activity in Maryland was carried out from the direct orders of the Northern Great “Emancipator”.
Now before the South seceded, several northern states had also threatened secession. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island had all threatened secession as far back as James Madison’s administration. In addition, the state of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware were threaten secession during the first half of the nineteenth century, long before the southern states even considered doing such a thing.
It is commonly said that Lincoln “saved” the Union. Lincoln did not save the Union; Lincoln subjugated the Union. There is a huge difference. A union that is not voluntary is not a union. Does a man have a right to force a woman to marry him or force a woman to stay married with him? In this eyes of God, a union of husband and wife is far superior to a union of states. Now if God recognized the right of husbands and wives to separate,( and He does) to try and suggest that states do not have the right to lawfully (under natural and divine right) to separate is the most preposterous proposition imaginable.
People say that Lincoln freed the slaves. Lincoln did NOT free a single slave. His so-called Emancipation Proclamation had no authority in the southern states, as they had already separated into another county. Imagine the President today signing a proclamation to free folks in say, China or Saudi Arabia, or even North Korea. He would be laughed out of Washington. Lincoln had no authority over the Confederate States of America. No one knew this more than Lincoln.
Most do not know that Lincoln’s proclamation did not free a single slave in the United States, the only country in which he did have authority. Yep, you read that right, the Emancipation Proclamation deliberately ignored slavery in the North. Very few realize that when Lincoln signed his proclamation there were over 300,000 slaveholders who were fighting in the Union Army. Now if you think I’m making this stuff up, check it out for yourself. Then you’ll find I’m right.
One such northern slaveholder was General, and later to be US President, Ulysses S. Grant. In fact Grant maintained possession of his slaves even after the War Between the States concluded. Here is should be noted that the Confederate General Robert E Lee, freed his slaves before hostilities between the north and south broke out. When asked why he refused to free his slaves, Grant replied “Good help is hard to find these days”
Slavery in this nation did not end until the 13th Amendment to t he Constitution was ratified on December 6, 1865
Speaking of the 13th Amendment, did you know that Lincoln authored his own 13th Amendment? It’s the only amendment to the Constitution ever proposed by a sitting U.S. President. Here is the Lincoln proposed 13th amendment: “No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give Congress the power to abolish or interfere within any state with the domestic institutions thereof, including that a person’s held to labor or service by laws or said State.”
You heard that right, Abraham Lincoln himself proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution preserving the institution of slavery. This proposed amendment was written in March 1861, a month before shots were fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina.
Now the State of South Carolina was particularly incensed at the tariffs enacted in 1828 and again in 1832. The Tafiff of 1828 was disdainfully called “The Tariff of Abominations” by the State of South Carolina. And so the South Carolina legislature declared that tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were “unauthorized the constitution of the United States”.
Think about this for a minute here. Why would the southern states secede from the Union over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln had offered an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing the preservation of slavery? That makes no sense. If the issue was predominantly slavery, all the South needed to do was go along with Lincoln, and his proposed 13th amendment would have permanently preserved slavery among the southern, and also northern, states. Does that sound like a body of people who were willing to lose hundreds of thousands of men on the battlefield over saving slavery? It’s true nonsense to even think the War Between The States was fought over slavery.
It was money. Only money. The problem was Lincoln wanted the southern states to pay the Union a 40% tariff on their exports. The South considered that outrageous and refused to pay. By the time hostilities broke out in 1861, the south was paying up to and perhaps exceeding 70% of the nation’s taxes. Prior to the war, the South was very prosperous and productive. Much more prosperous and productive than the North. So Washington, D.C. kept raising the taxes and tariffs on the south. I’m sure you know that game, the same way that the government keeps raising the taxes on prosperous Americans to this day.
This was much the same story of the way the colonies refused to pat the demanded tariff of the British Crown, albeit the tariffs of the Crown were much lower than those demanded by Lincoln. Lincoln’s proposed 13th Amendment was an attempt to entice the South into paying the tariffs by being willing to permanently ensconce the institution of slavery into the Constitution. AND THE SOUTH SAID NO.
The Congressional Record of the United States forever obliterates the notion that the North fought the War Between the State over slavery. Read for yourself. This resolution was passed unanimously in the U.S. Congress on July 23, 1861: “The War is waged by the government of the United States no in the spirit of conquest of subjugation, nor for the purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the right or institutions of the states, but to defend and protect the Union.”
The preserved record could not be more clearer. The U.S. Congress declared that the war against the South was not an attempt to overthrow on interfere with the “institutions” of the states, bu to keep the Union intact (by force). The institutions referred to most certainly included the institution of slavery. Hear it loud and clear, Lincoln’s war against the South had NOTHING to do with ending slavery. So said the U.S. Congress by unanimous resolution in 1861.
Abraham Lincoln, himself, said it was never his intention to end the institution of slavery. In a letter to Alexander Stevens, who later became the Vice President of the Confederacy, Lincoln wrote this: “Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican Administration would directly, or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them, about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as once a friend, and still, I hope, ant an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears. The South would be in on more danger in this respect than it was in the days of Washington.
Again, what could be more clearer? Lincoln, himself, said the southern states had nothing to fear from him in regard to abolishing slavery.
On another occasion Lincoln said: “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it.” He also said “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do s and I have no inclination to do so.
Like I said at the front, some will not believe, some will be enlightened and some will say I know that all the time. Then some will become enraged that I would even dare say such things about President Lincoln. Keep in mind Lincoln, himself, spoke the words and made the record. Should you choose not to believe, maybe, just maybe, you’ve succumbed to the spin doctors of 1865.
From The EastWing, The Real Reason For The War Between The States
I Wish You Well,